YORK DAY 4: Stats Pointers

Day 4 stats pointers…

From the stats report HERE>>> 


‘Qualifiers’ from the report above…


Haggas (any) 

2.25 – A Star Above

2.25 – Favourite Moon H4

Dods (14/1<) 


Appleby (10/1<) 

3.40 – Ghostwatch

T Easterby 


Trainer/Jockey Combos 

2.25 – Coltrane H4

3.40 – Shailene

4.40 – Lucander



Handicap Stats/Trends/ Trainer Pointers

2.25 – Melrose Handicap

Trainers (to have won race/with runners)

  • Favorite Moon H4/ A Star Above
  • Kipps
  • Eastern Sheriff


Trainers (to have won race/with runners)

  • Sinjaari H2
  • Mountain Hunter
  • Pivoine
  • Society Red / Silver Dust


Trainers (to have won race/with runners)

  • Sunday Sovereign
  • Queens Order


3.40 – Ebor Handicap

Trends Pointers

I’m not sure they’re of much use in this race in truth and very much a guide… but looking at those aged 5+, top 3/placed at least once on last three starts, 0-1 runs at the course, and who didn’t win on their 1st career start… leaves 10/12 (10/56, 21p, +191 BFSP)…

Fujaira Prince / Deja H3/ Verdana Blue H4/ Ghostwatch / Jeremia / Stargazer 

Trainers (to have won race last 12 years/with runners)

  • True Self
  • El Misk


That’s all for Saturday’s York pointers.

GL, Josh


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest
Share on linkedin
Share on telegram

Post Comments

Do join in the conversation below, we're a friendly bunch.. all questions welcome, and do share your selections or thoughts

6 Responses

  1. Coltrane an impressive winner for o Murphy / A Balding combo

    Not that I backed it but it adds nicely to that angle. BSP 16 I think

    Good work Josh

    1. Thanks Rick, yep they’ve highlighted a few winners..
      Wonderful hindsight of course but could have just stuck with the qualifiers that had a red H next to their name, top 4 HRB.. I think that makes them 2/6 or so, +18 to morning odds and bit higher BFSP I suspect.
      As easy as that!! No need to the hours of toil! I haven’t used them well enough clearly. Brunch and Coltrane the H winners.
      Hopefully some readers may have taken that simple systematic approach.
      Still, I won’t moan. A positive for the stats foundation work and gives longer term hope!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.