YORK DAY 4: Stats Pointers

Day 4 stats pointers…

From the stats report HERE>>> 

*

‘Qualifiers’ from the report above…

Trainers

Haggas (any) 

2.25 – A Star Above

2.25 – Favourite Moon H4

Dods (14/1<) 

None.

Appleby (10/1<) 

3.40 – Ghostwatch

T Easterby 

None.

Trainer/Jockey Combos 

2.25 – Coltrane H4

3.40 – Shailene

4.40 – Lucander

 

*

Handicap Stats/Trends/ Trainer Pointers

2.25 – Melrose Handicap

Trainers (to have won race/with runners)

  • Favorite Moon H4/ A Star Above
  • Kipps
  • Eastern Sheriff

4.40 

Trainers (to have won race/with runners)

  • Sinjaari H2
  • Mountain Hunter
  • Pivoine
  • Society Red / Silver Dust

5.10

Trainers (to have won race/with runners)

  • Sunday Sovereign
  • Queens Order

*

3.40 – Ebor Handicap

Trends Pointers

I’m not sure they’re of much use in this race in truth and very much a guide… but looking at those aged 5+, top 3/placed at least once on last three starts, 0-1 runs at the course, and who didn’t win on their 1st career start… leaves 10/12 (10/56, 21p, +191 BFSP)…

Fujaira Prince / Deja H3/ Verdana Blue H4/ Ghostwatch / Jeremia / Stargazer 

Trainers (to have won race last 12 years/with runners)

  • True Self
  • El Misk

*

That’s all for Saturday’s York pointers.

GL, Josh

 

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn
Telegram

Post Comments

Do join in the conversation below, we're a friendly bunch.. all questions welcome, and do share your selections or thoughts

6 Responses

  1. Coltrane an impressive winner for o Murphy / A Balding combo

    Not that I backed it but it adds nicely to that angle. BSP 16 I think

    Good work Josh

    1. Thanks Rick, yep they’ve highlighted a few winners..
      Wonderful hindsight of course but could have just stuck with the qualifiers that had a red H next to their name, top 4 HRB.. I think that makes them 2/6 or so, +18 to morning odds and bit higher BFSP I suspect.
      As easy as that!! No need to the hours of toil! I haven’t used them well enough clearly. Brunch and Coltrane the H winners.
      Hopefully some readers may have taken that simple systematic approach.
      Still, I won’t moan. A positive for the stats foundation work and gives longer term hope!
      Josh

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.